(Continued from last Monday)On the issue of five persons voting for and threevoting against, I submit that apart from thefact that it . confirmed that it was a democratic and majority decision, it also has constitutional backing: See Section 159[2] of the 1999 Constitution which provides:A member of such a body shall be entitled to one vote, and a decision of the meeting may be taken and any act or thing may be done in the name of the body by a majority of the members present at the meeting.SENATE AND THE COURT LACK JURISDICTION TO SET ASIDE THE SUSPENSIONCritics or opponents of the suspension have called upon the Senate to reverse or set aside the suspension of the PCA and direct his reinstatement. Counsel to the suspended PCA have gone to Court to challenge the suspension. I submit without any fear of contradiction, that the Senate and the Court, jointly or severally, does not have the jurisdiction to set aside or reverse the suspension and direct the reinstatement of the PCA being an exercise of power of disciplinary control by the NJC over the PCA: See Section 158[1] of the Constitution which provides:In exercising its power to make appointments or to exercise disciplinary control over persons, the Code of Conduct Bureau, the National Judicial Council, the Federal Civil Service Commission, the Federal Judicial Service Commission, the Revenue Mobilisation and Fiscal Commission, the Federal Character Commission, and the Independent National Electoral Commission shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or person.I submit that Section 158[1] of the Constitution is mandatory and binding on the Senate and the Court. See Section 1 [1] of the Constitution which provides:This Constitution is supreme and its provisions shall have binding force on all authorities and persons throughout the Federal Republic of Nigeria.PRESIDENT JONATHAN WAS RIGHT IN APPOINTING ACTING PCASupporters of the PCA have queried what they called the haste with which President Jonathan appointed an Acting PCA in the person of Justice Dalhatu Adamu and his legal authority to do so. In reply thereto, I humbly refer to Section 238[4] and [5] of the Constitution which respectively provides:If the office of President of the Court of Appeal is vacant or if the the person holding the office is for any reason unable to perform the functions of the office, then until a person has been appointed to and has assumed the functions of that office, or until the person holding the office has resumed those functions, the President shall appoint the most senior Justice of the Court of Appeal to perform those functions.Except on the recommendation of the National Judicial Council, an appointment pursuant to the provisions of subsection [4] of this section shall cease to have effect after the expiration of three monthsfrom the date of such appointment, and the President shall not re-appoint a person whose appointment has lapsed.I submit that President Jonathan did not breach any law by appointing an Acting PCA at the time and in the manner he did. Rather, Mr. President complied with a mandatory constitutional provision over which he had no option or choice. Appointing an Acting PCA falls within the Job Schedule of Mr. President under Section 238[4] or the Constitution. It is not a duty Mr. President can delegate. The Sworn Oaths of Mr. President in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution is to carry out his presidential duties in accordance with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the law.I submit that appointment of Acting PCA under Section 238[4] of the Constitution by the President does not require Confirmation by Senate as required by Section 238 [1] of the Constitution, not being a substantive appointment.JUSTICE IBRAHIM AUTA NJC REVIEW COMMITTEEThe major grudge supporters of Justice Salami had against this Committee was that Justice Auta was a junior Judge who could not be looking into the case between judicial officers who are senior to him. This argument shows the depth of the absurdity, ridicule, hollowness and intellectual barrenness of the arguments of advocates of the suspended PCA. 'The suspended PCA through his Counsel has gone to Court and the case has been assigned to Justice Donatus Okorowo. Is Justice Okorowo or any Judge of the Federal High Court, who is to hear the case of the suspended PCA, against the retiring CJN and the NJC senior to them' Please give me a break.THE OPTION LEFT FOR JUSTICE SALAMI TO RETURN TO OFFICEFrom the above discussion of the relevant laws, the fate of the PCA still depends on the NJC if I-lis Lordship wishes to return and remain as the PCA. This the PCA may achieve by appealing to the NJC. The suspension, by Section 238 [5] of the Constitution, might only be for a period of three months at the first instance.But the present approach of allowing noisy placard carrying non-legal minds to argue his case on the pages of newspapers might not reinstate His Lordship to his office. His Lordship ought to seek and exhaust internal remedies available within the FJSC and NJC. This is my humble view. I beg to submit, and on that note, I rest my case.Austin Osarenkhoe Esq, legal practitioner, wrote from Benin City (08035302022, 08053311022 ) Concluded
Click here to read full news..
