Why James Hansen Is Wrong About Nuclear Power

mdsolar writes: Climatologist James Hansen argued last month, "Nuclear power paves the only viable path forward on climate change." He is wrong. As the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) and International Energy Agency (IEA) explained in a major report last year, in the best-case scenario, nuclear power can play a modest, but important, role in avoiding catastrophic global warming if it can solve its various nagging problemsparticularly high construction costwithout sacrificing safety. Hansen and a handful of other climate scientists I also greatly respectKen Caldeira, Tom Wigley, and Kerry Emanuelpresent a mostly handwaving argument in which new nuclear power achieves and sustains an unprecedented growth rate for decades. The one quantitative "illustrative scenario" they propose"a total requirement of 115 reactors per year to 2050 to entirely decarbonise the global electricity system"is far beyond what the world ever sustained during the nuclear heyday of the 1970s, and far beyond what the overwhelming majority of energy experts, including those sympathetic to the industry, think is plausible. Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Click here to read full news..